Eastern Finland study: product enjoyment links green values to willingness to pay a premium
Researchers at the University of Eastern Finland report that enjoyment strengthens the link between green values and willingness to pay more, while a focus on practicality weakens it.

Researchers at the University of Eastern Finland, led by Jani Holopainen and doctoral researcher Jyri Hoffrén, examined why consumers who value sustainability often do not pay more for green products, Earth.com reports. The work comprised three studies on a demographically representative panel of Finnish and Dutch citizens and was published in Forest Policy and Economics earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗. The authors found that hedonic attitudes, meaning the sense that a sustainable product is fun, exciting or delightful, strengthen the link between values and willingness to pay a premium. Utilitarian attitudes, meaning price, efficiency and practicality, weaken it
earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗.
Three studies, one pattern
The first study tested the theoretical model on 461 participants. Sustainable consumption values strongly predicted willingness to pay a premium, and hedonic attitudes made that relationship stronger earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗. In the base model, values alone explained 47% of the variance; adding hedonic and utilitarian attitudes as moderators raised it to nearly 48%. The interaction effects were significant and pointed in opposite directions
earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗.
The second study followed 239 participants for two years. Values and attitudes were measured at one point and actual purchasing behavior two years later. Values predicted behavior across that interval, hedonic attitudes strengthened the link, and utilitarian attitudes weakened it earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗. "Enjoyment helps translate sustainability values into actual consumption behavior," Hoffrén said
earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗.
Differences between products
The third study used three wood-based bioproducts: a bioplastic water bottle, a T-shirt made from wood-based fabric and a wood-based biofuel. For the bottle, both effects were clear: hedonic attitudes raised willingness to pay and utilitarian attitudes lowered it earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗. For the T-shirt, utilitarian attitudes still suppressed willingness to pay, but the hedonic boost disappeared
earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗.
For biofuel, the negative utilitarian interaction was the strongest of the three products. People who judged it by price and efficiency were significantly less likely to pay a premium even with strong sustainability values, and the hedonic interaction was not statistically significant earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗.
The researchers also suggest that emphasizing enjoyment could make consumers less critical of environmental claims. "If product marketing emphasizes enjoyment without genuine experiential benefits, it may lose credibility," Hoffrén said earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗. He added that consumers may consider sustainability important but decide not to buy if price, practicality or perceived benefits fail to meet their expectations
earth.com
Earth.comearth.comOpen source ↗.



